ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2025
Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying risk factors for osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Pooled it
- Decoding Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw: Radiological Progression and a Novel CT-Based Grading System.Cancers · 2026Article
- Image-based mandibular and maxillary parcellation and annotation using computed tomography (IMPACT): a deep learning-based clinical tool for orodental dose estimation and osteoradionecrosis assessment.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw is a severe complication affecting up to 15% of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The ClinRad system, endorsed by ASCO/ISOO/MASCC, incorporates radiographic features for ORN severity classification, but variability in imaging use and specialty expertise may impact diagnostic accuracy. This study benchmarks physician performance in diagnosing and staging ORN across specialties and imaging modalities. MATERIALS &
methodsA retrospective diagnostic validation study was conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center, involving 20 physicians from oral oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, and neuroradiology. Participants reviewed 85 de-identified imaging sets (CT and orthopantogram (OPG)) from 30 patients with confirmed ORN, diagnosing and staging cases using the ClinRad system. ROC analysis assessed diagnostic accuracy, while intra- and inter-observer agreement was measured using Cohen's and Fleiss kappa statistics.
resultsPaired CT-OPG imaging significantly improved diagnostic performance across specialties (p < 0.001), with AUC values ranging from 0.79 (residents) to 0.98 (surgeons). However, inter- and intra-rater agreement remained low, with median Fleiss kappa values of 0.22, 0.13, and 0.05 for ClinRad stages 0/1, 2, and 3, respectively. No specialty demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy (p > 0.05).
conclusionThis study establishes a benchmark for radiographic ORN detection, revealing diagnostic variability across specialties. Findings emphasize the need for standardized imaging protocols, interdisciplinary training, and multimodal imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.