ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2025
Dietary context in the association between red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes.
Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Substitution of White Meat for Red Meat and Diabetes Risk: A Prospective Cohort Study Stratified by Red Meat Intake.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Research on the mechanism of cow milk protein dietary intervention in ameliorating systemic chronic inflammation in type 2 diabetes by disrupting the ROS-M1 macrophage axis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Link Between Meat Intake and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians: Insights Based on Lipidomic Profiles.Diabetes care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt has been suggested that dietary factors correlated with red meat may contribute to its adverse health effects, while consuming red meat within a healthy diet may not necessarily increase disease risk.
methodsAmong 204,740 participants from three prospective cohorts, we examined the association between red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) across different levels of diet quality, measured by Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)-2010 (excluding red and processed meat component), using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Dietary intake was assessed using repeated food frequency questionnaires.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 28 years, 18,868 cases were documented. Mean values were 47.3 (SD 8.5) for AHEI-2010 and 6.5 (SD 3.5), 1.8 (SD 1.5), and 4.8 (SD 2.5) servings/week for total, processed, and unprocessed red meat, respectively. Greater red meat consumption was consistently associated with a higher T2D risk across AHEI-2010 strata. Comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of red meat consumption in the highest diet quality quintile, the multivariable-adjusted HRs were 1.95 (1.72, 2.21) for total, 1.88 (1.67, 2.13) for processed, and 1.67 (1.47, 1.90) for unprocessed red meat. Substituting red meat with major food groups was associated with a lower T2D risk, particularly among those with high diet quality. The benefit of lowering red meat consumption was greater in participants with higher diet quality.
conclusionsThe risk associated with high red meat consumption persisted even among participants with a relatively high diet quality, underscoring the importance of limiting red meat consumption to prevent T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.