Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319912›Full record

ArticleClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2025

Exploring Predictors of Post-Surgical Health-Related Quality of Life and Revision Surgery in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Cohort Study.

Marc C den Heijer, Merel M van der Ven, Gonneke E Joustra, Karin M Vermeulen, Robert A Feijen, Astrid G W Korsten-Meijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring Predictors of Post-Surgical Health-Related Quality of Life and Revision Surgery in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Cohort Study.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc C den HeijerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-613X
Merel M van der VenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-2632-6198
Gonneke E JoustraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8171-0546
Karin M VermeulenDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9257-2791
Robert A FeijenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8568-0847
Astrid G W Korsten-MeijerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-7698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFunctional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has been shown to be effective in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), though patient selection remains crucial for optimising outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of improved postoperative HRQoL and predictors of revision surgery in CRSwNP patients undergoing FESS.

designCohort study.

settingTertiary referral hospital.

participantsA total of 153 patients were enrolled in this study. They were asked to fill out the Endonasal Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) preoperatively, and then at 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

main outcome measuresLinear mixed model (LMM) analyses were performed to evaluate the overall postoperative HRQoL and the separate health domains, as well as the impact of specific variables (sex, age, ASA classification, smoking, asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic rhinitis, Lund-Mackay score, surgical procedure, postoperative antibiotics, postoperative prednisolone, FESS history, eosinophilia and preoperative EES-Q score) on HRQoL improvement. Using the same variables, a logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of revision surgery.

resultsThe total EES-Q score (p < 0.001), as well as the physical (p < 0.001) and social (p < 0.001) domains, significantly improved postoperatively. In the LMM analysis, the preoperative EES-Q score was the only significant variable on the postoperative HRQoL outcome (p < 0.001). Eosinophilia was the only significant variable on revision surgery (p = 0.036).

conclusionsFESS significantly improved postoperative HRQoL. Patients reporting worse preoperative HRQoL showed the greatest improvement postoperatively. Proven eosinophilia was the only significant predictor of revision surgery.

Indexed as

EndoscopyNasal PolypsQuality of LifeReoperationRhinitisSinusitisAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRhinosinusitisSurveys and Questionnaireschronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypsEES‐Qfunctional endoscopic sinus surgeryhealth‐related quality of lifepatient‐reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID40319912
PMCPMC12319467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.