ReviewTalanta2025
Molecularly imprinted polymers for illicit drug detection: A review of computational and synthesis methods.
Review in Talanta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electropolymerized Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Supported on Carbon-Based Materials for (Bio)sensing: Direct and Indirect Detection Strategies.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Piperine: From Green Extraction to Clinical Translation-A Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- A Dual-Template Molecularly Imprinted Polymer to Inhibit Quorum Sensing Molecules: Theoretical Design, Optimized Synthesis, Physicochemical Characterization and Preliminary Microbiological Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review discusses the current state of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) used for drug extraction and quantification. It begins with an introduction to MIP synthesis techniques that utilize illegal drugs as templates. The subsequent sections explore applications, focusing on the detection of illegal narcotics. The advantages and limitations of MIPs receive detailed examination. A comprehensive literature survey then covers various classes of illicit drugs, including opioids, stimulants, cannabinoids, and hallucinogens. Notably, the review highlights the role of computational simulations, including density functional theory (DFT), in optimizing MIP fabrication and enhancing performance. The review concludes with a discussion on the challenges related to the lack of standard parameters for selectivity, the need for robust characterization methods, and the pros and cons of using nanomaterials in MIPs. Recommendations for resolving these issues and potential future developments aimed at broadening the application scope in relevant fields are presented. Overall, this review serves as a valuable resource for researchers involved in the development and application of illicit drug detection technologies using molecularly imprinted polymers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.