ArticleAnnals of botany2025
On the importance of rhizosphere conductance and soil-root contact in drying soils.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsRoot water uptake (RWU) is influenced by rhizosphere conductance and soil-root contact, which vary with soil texture and root structure, including root hairs. Current simplified models often fail to capture the spatial complexity of these interactions in drying soils. The aim of this study was to examine how rhizosphere conductance, soil-root contact and root hairs affect RWU.
methodsWe used an explicit three-dimensional functional-structural model to investigate how root and rhizosphere hydraulics influence the transpiration rate-leaf water potential relationship of two maize (Zea mays) genotypes (with and without root hairs) grown in two contrasting soil textures (loam and sand) during soil drying. The model incorporated rhizosphere resistance in series with radial root resistance, with the latter being influenced by maturation (development of apoplastic barriers with age). It considered two critical processes: (1) the decrease in soil water potential between bulk soil and the soil-root interface; and (2) the extent of soil-root contact. KEY
resultsThe simulations revealed that RWU was highly soil texture specific. In loam, the non-linearity in the transpiration rate-leaf water potential relationship was attributable primarily to localized uptake fluxes and high rhizosphere resistance as soil dried. In sand, however, where soil-root contact was less effective, rhizosphere conductance became a significant limiting factor for RWU, even at relatively higher soil water potential in comparison to loam. Root hairs did not make a significant contribution to rhizosphere conductance, probably owing to the dominant effect of soil-root interaction. Additionally, variations in root hydraulic conductance and its change with root tissue age impacted the accuracy of the model.
conclusionsThe explicit three-dimensional model provides a more precise representation of RWU dynamics by pinpointing exact uptake locations and primary limiting factors and by quantifying the proportion of root surface actively engaged in RWU. This approach offers notable improvements over conventional models for understanding the spatial dynamics of water uptake in different soil environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.