ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Aging and the neuropsychiatry of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship status and the neurobehavioral symptoms of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Differential Associations Between Perceived Social Support and Cognition in Older Adults With and Without Multiple Sclerosis.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- Unraveling fear of relapse in multiple sclerosis: beyond perfectionism and uncertainty.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging in multiple sclerosis (MS) affects clinical and radiological disease activity. Yet, evidence is equivocal about the effects of aging on the neuropsychiatric sequelae of MS, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. This study aimed to clarify how the neuropsychiatric symptoms of MS vary across ages. A consecutive cohort of 1194 people with MS (pwMS) underwent neuropsychological testing using the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale sub-scales for anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) for cognitive complaints. Participants were stratified into age sub-groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years. t-tests were undertaken to compare symptoms between the 18-29 and 50-59 sub-groups. Linear regression analyses, controlling for disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS), sex, educational years, and high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy use, were used to evaluate whether age significantly predicted neuropsychiatric sequelae. Mean age was 42.15 years, 74.12% were female, and median EDSS was 2.00. Older pwMS had reduced HADS-A, PDQ, California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) scores, all p < 0.01. There were no age differences on the HADS-D, MFIS, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, or Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. Controlling for covariates, older age independently predicted reduced HADS-A, CVLT, BVMT, SDMT, and D-KEFS scores, all p < 0.01. In summary, as pwMS age, anxiety declines and performance on learning, memory, processing speed, and executive function tests worsens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.