ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2025
[
Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor microenvironment-mediated hematologic toxicity ofWorld journal of urology · 2026Review
- Highlight selection of radiochemistry and radiopharmacy developments by editorial board.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTargeted Alpha Therapy shows very promising clinical results in a cancer treatment and it should be comparable or better than chemotherapy and β-radionuclide therapy, in terms of efficacy and toxicity. The use of α-emission offers advantages over β-emission due to the high linear energy transfer and the limited range in tissue. Actinium-225 is an α-emitter with a half-life of 9.92 days, which is an appropriate half-life for convenient treatment. Actinium-225 is introduced to tumor-targeting vectors through its complexation by a chelating moiety. On this basis, the aim of this study is to develop an [
resultsdifferent radiolabeling conditions and different reaction times have been used and compared. The best radiochemical yields (> 95%) were obtained when the peptide was dissolved in water and it was used at quantity of 100 µg in gentisic buffer, without stabilizing agent. The reaction was conducted at 97 °C and no significant change in labeling yield was observed when the time reaction increased. This condition ensures an adequate stability at 24 h around 90%.
conclusionsthe radiolabeling method employed in our experiments has demonstrated consistent reproducibility, enabling us to produce a radiopharmaceutical that meets pharmaceutical-grade standards. Greater difficulties occurred in defining the optimal procedures for quality controls, due to the unique physical properties of actinium. Efforts were made to standardize the quality control methods in accordance with pharmacopoeia standards; however, the methods' feasibility is still uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.