ArticleSleep2025
Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer's disease and older adults.
Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Like Taking Part in Star Wars": Qualitative Study Using Thematic Analysis to Explore the Acceptability and Experiences of Older Adults Participating in Remote Longitudinal Sleep and Dementia Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Mind the gap: obtaining reliable sleep estimates and the diagnostic value of sleep discrepancy in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Sleep and False Memory Production: The Modulating Role of Immediate Testing and Type of Retrieval.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- An open science resource for accelerating scalable digital health research in autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Personalized supervised and unsupervised intracranial sleep decoding during deep brain stimulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Nightly variations in sleep quality and next-day cognitive performance: an in-home study in healthy older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Usability and stability of longitudinal at-home sleep evaluation using the Waveband electroencephalogram headband in an insomnia population.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Wearable EEG Sensor Analysis for Cognitive Profiling in Educational Contexts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Using a wearable EEG device to examine age trends in sleep macro- and micro-architecture across adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the performance of wearable EEG sleep monitoring devices: a meta-analysis approach.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Remote Sleep and Cognitive Research in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Revealing sleep and pain reciprocity with wearables and machine learning.Communications medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesPortable electroencephalography (EEG) devices offer the potential for accurate quantification of sleep at home but have not been evaluated in relevant populations. We assessed the Dreem headband (DHB) and its automated sleep staging algorithm in 62 older adults [age (mean ± SD) 70.5 ± 6.7 years; 12 Alzheimer's disease].
methodsThe accuracy of sleep measures, epoch-by-epoch staging, and the quality of EEG signals for quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis were compared to standard polysomnography (PSG) in a sleep laboratory.
resultsThe DHB algorithm accurately estimated total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SEFF) with a symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) < 10%. Wake after sleep onset (WASO) and number of awakenings (NAW) were underestimated (WASO: ~17 minutes; NAW: ~9 counts) with SMAPE < 20%. Sleep onset latency (SOL) was overestimated by ~30 minutes when using the entire DHB recording period, but it was accurate (bias: 0.3 minutes) when estimated over the lights-off period. Stage N3 and total non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep durations were estimated accurately (bias < 20 minutes), while REM sleep was overestimated (~25 minutes; SMAPE: ~24%). Epoch-by-epoch sleep/wake classification showed acceptable performance (MCC = 0.77 ± 0.17) and five-stage sleep classification was moderate (MCC = 0.54 ± 0.14). After artifact removal, 73% of the recordings were usable for qEEG analysis. Concordance (p < 0.001) of EEG band power ranged from moderate to good: slow-wave activity r2 = 0.57; theta r2 = 0.56; alpha r2 = 0.65; sigma power r2 = 0.34.
conclusionsDHB algorithm provides accurate estimates of several sleep measures and qEEG metrics. However, further improvement in REM detection is needed to enhance its utility for research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.