Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319389›Full record

ArticleSleep2025

Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer's disease and older adults.

Kiran K G Ravindran, Ciro Della Monica, Giuseppe Atzori, Ramin Nilforooshan, Hana Hassanin, Victoria Revell, Derk-Jan Dijk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kiran K G RavindranUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.ORCID 0000-0003-3051-0266
Ciro Della MonicaUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.
Giuseppe AtzoriUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.
Ramin NilforooshanUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.
Hana HassaninUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.
Victoria RevellUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.
Derk-Jan DijkUK Dementia Research Institute, Care Research and Technology Centre at Imperial College, London.ORCID 0000-0001-5314-1008

Funding

UK Dementia Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesPortable electroencephalography (EEG) devices offer the potential for accurate quantification of sleep at home but have not been evaluated in relevant populations. We assessed the Dreem headband (DHB) and its automated sleep staging algorithm in 62 older adults [age (mean ± SD) 70.5 ± 6.7 years; 12 Alzheimer's disease].

methodsThe accuracy of sleep measures, epoch-by-epoch staging, and the quality of EEG signals for quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis were compared to standard polysomnography (PSG) in a sleep laboratory.

resultsThe DHB algorithm accurately estimated total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SEFF) with a symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) < 10%. Wake after sleep onset (WASO) and number of awakenings (NAW) were underestimated (WASO: ~17 minutes; NAW: ~9 counts) with SMAPE < 20%. Sleep onset latency (SOL) was overestimated by ~30 minutes when using the entire DHB recording period, but it was accurate (bias: 0.3 minutes) when estimated over the lights-off period. Stage N3 and total non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep durations were estimated accurately (bias < 20 minutes), while REM sleep was overestimated (~25 minutes; SMAPE: ~24%). Epoch-by-epoch sleep/wake classification showed acceptable performance (MCC = 0.77 ± 0.17) and five-stage sleep classification was moderate (MCC = 0.54 ± 0.14). After artifact removal, 73% of the recordings were usable for qEEG analysis. Concordance (p < 0.001) of EEG band power ranged from moderate to good: slow-wave activity r2 = 0.57; theta r2 = 0.56; alpha r2 = 0.65; sigma power r2 = 0.34.

conclusionsDHB algorithm provides accurate estimates of several sleep measures and qEEG metrics. However, further improvement in REM detection is needed to enhance its utility for research and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseElectroencephalographySleep StagesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePolysomnographydementiaDreem headbandelectroencephalographyevaluationpolysomnographysleepwearables

Identifiers

PMID40319389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.