Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319374›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

Radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive decline among adult intracranial tumor patients: A voxel-based approach.

Charlotte Sleurs, Catharina M L Zegers, Marvin F Ribeiro, Wouter van Elmpt, Jeanette Dijkstra, Alida A Postma, Laurien De Roeck, Karin Gehring, Wouter De Baene, Margriet M Sitskoorn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte SleursDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-8330
Catharina M L ZegersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marvin F RibeiroDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Mental Health and Neuroscience research institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wouter van ElmptDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeanette DijkstraDepartment of Medical Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alida A PostmaDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Mental Health and Neuroscience research institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Laurien De RoeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-1816
Karin GehringDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Wouter De BaeneDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Margriet M SitskoornDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Maarten LambrechtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-2691
Daniëlle B P EekersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCranial irradiation is a key component of neuro-oncological treatment but can result in cognitive side effects. Preserving cognition from radiotherapy-(RT)-induced toxicity remains an ongoing debate. To spatially map radiotoxic effects in patients who underwent cranial RT, this study applied a voxel-based approach.

methodsCognitive assessments (Controlled Word Association (COWA), Hopkins Verbal Learning (HVLT-R), and Trail Making Tests (TMT A,B)) were conducted prospectively before, 6 months and 1 year post-RT in 111 intracranial tumor patients (18-80 years). Reliable change indices indicated cognitive changes across timepoints. CT and T1-weighted MRI scans acquired at diagnosis were co-registered, normalized to standard space, and smoothed. Voxel-wise permutation-based regression analyses examined the relationship between RT dose and cognitive decline (α < 0.05 at cluster level).

resultsImages of 111 patients (Mdn age = 55.39 years; 47% male; lesions were gliomas (61%), meningiomas (18%), other (21%); in frontal (33%), temporal (25%), other location (42%)) were analyzed. Reliable decline was most pronounced at 6 months, particularly on the TMT A (25.77%), TMT B (24.21%), and HVLT immediate recall (21%). At 1 year, 20% of patients continued to show a decline in TMT B. Higher RT doses to frontal gyri, temporal, occipital, and para-central regions were associated with declines in verbal fluency, memory, processing speed, and flexibility at both peak- and cluster-level.

conclusionDifferential voxel-wise RT dose effects at peak versus cluster level suggest local and network-based recruitment of diverse functional regions and vulnerability to cranial RT. These insights may help re-define key regions at risk from a network-based perspective, preserving cognition in future RT planning.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCognition DisordersCranial IrradiationRadiation InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPrognosiscranial radiationintracranial tumorsneurocognitive sequelaevoxel-based image analysis

Identifiers

PMID40319374
PMCPMC12833545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.