ArticleSystematic biology2025
Rampant Reticulation in a Rapid Radiation of Tropical Trees-Insights from Inga (Fabaceae).
Article in Systematic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The complex interaction between mammalian herbivores, climate, soil and fire has shaped the evolution and distribution of plant spinescence across biogeographical realms.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- The frequency and importance of polyploidy in tropical rainforest tree radiations.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Improved phylogenetic resolution within the Neotropical rainforest genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- From assemblies to ancestry: Genomic advances illuminates legume evolution.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Do syngameons exist in tropical trees? Challenges to determine their existence and estimate their frequency.Biology letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary radiations underlie much of the species diversity of life on Earth, particularly within the world's most species-rich tree flora-that of the Amazon rainforest. Hybridization occurs in many radiations, with effects ranging from homogenization of divergent species to the generation of genetic and phenotypic novelty that fuels speciation. However, the influence of hybridization on Amazonian tree radiations has been little studied. We address this using the ubiquitous, species-rich, Neotropical tree genus Inga, which typifies rapid radiations of rainforest trees. We assess patterns of gene tree incongruence to ascertain whether hybridization was associated with rapid radiation in Inga. Given the importance of insect herbivory in structuring rainforest tree communities (and hence the potential for hybridization to promote adaptation through admixture of defense traits), we also test whether introgression of loci underlying chemical defenses against herbivory occurred during the radiation of Inga. Our phylogenomic analyses of 189/288 Inga species using >1300 target capture loci showed widespread introgression in Inga. Specifically, we found widespread phylogenetic incongruence explained by introgression, with phylogenetic networks recovering multiple introgression events across Inga and up to 20% of shared, likely introgressed, genetic variation between some species. In addition, most defense chemistry loci showed evidence of positive selection and marginally higher levels of introgression. Overall, our results suggest that introgression has occurred widely over the course of Inga's history, possibly in a syngameon scenario, likely facilitated by extensive dispersal across Amazonia. Furthermore, in some cases, introgression of chemical defense loci may influence adaptation in Inga.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.