Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319279›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

"Well, it's very doctor-related" - interprofessional communication and collaboration between GP practices and nurses in the ambulant setting: a qualitative study in southern Germany.

Kim Nordmann, Stefanie Sauter, Marie-Christin Redlich, Patricia Möbius-Lerch, Michael Schaller, Florian Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kim NordmannBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Stefanie SauterBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Marie-Christin RedlichBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Patricia Möbius-LerchBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Michael SchallerBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany.
Florian FischerBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany. florian.fischer@hs-kempten.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demographic transition in Germany is leading to an increase in the number of people needing care or nursing services in their own homes. Interprofessional communication and collaboration among healthcare professions providing outpatient care is paramount to ensure effective and high-quality patient-centred care. However, interprofessional communication and collaboration comes with complex prerequisites and rarely works smoothly. Thus, it is necessary to assess the current status quo. Therefore, the aim is to characterize communication patterns, factors influencing interprofessional communication and collaboration and expectations towards communication and collaboration between home-care nursing services and general practitioner practices in Germany.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals in general practitioners' practices (n=7) and nurses working in home-care nursing services (n=10) were conducted in southern Germany. The interviews were analysed using inductive thematic content analysis.

resultsCurrent communication occurs via fax, telephone or personal contact for various purposes, including issuing or rectifying prescriptions and exchanging information about change in a patient's condition. Key factors influencing interprofessional communication are organizational (e.g., lack of direct communication), profession-related (e.g., hierarchy) and individual (e.g., capacity to provide care). Interprofessional collaboration is scarce. Healthcare professionals expect uncomplicated, efficient and quick communication and collaboration through set channels.

conclusionsCurrent interaction patterns are deficient and require political, structural and educational changes to establish well-functioning collaboration in the ambulant sector that facilitates patient-centred care. Educational and political reforms should comprise expanding interprofessional education in curricula and the introduction of clear and secure communication channels.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHome Care ServicesInterprofessional RelationsPhysician-Nurse RelationsAdultFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchAmbulatory settingGermanyHome careNursingOutpatient carePhysicianPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID40319279
PMCPMC12048923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.