ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Whole-body vibration training reduces erector spinae stiffness by ultrasound shear-wave elastography: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute Effects of Percussive Therapy on Thigh Muscle Microcirculation and Oxygenation.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficient methods to reduce erector spinae stiffness are important for solving lumbar spine problems, however, the trunk training positions effective for reducing erector spinae stiffness are unclear. Furthermore, it unclear whether whole-body vibration and trunk training are synergistic. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the differences in the immediate effects on reducing erector spinae stiffness among three types of training: simple spinal flexion training, spinal neutral position training, and spinal flexion training combined with whole-body vibration.
methodsThis single-blind randomized controlled trial included 36 healthy university students who were assigned to either the spinal neutral position training group, spinal flexion training group, or whole-body vibration (vibration conditions: 35 Hz, 4 mm) + spinal flexion training group. Training consisted of only one session of the assigned exercise in each group (20 s × 8 sets, rest 15 s). The outcomes measured were erector spinae stiffness, tenderness threshold of the erector spinae, lumbar proprioception, and maximum lumbar forward bending angle. All statistical analyses were performed using a split-plot design analysis of variance.
resultsThere were no significant group × period interactions for erector spinae stiffness; however, a significant main effect of time was observed (p < 0.01). Comparison of pre- and post-intervention stiffness indicated no significant differences in the spinal flexion training group. In contrast, both the spinal neutral position (p < 0.01, pre-intervention: 49.0 [10.6], post-intervention: 47.1 [6.4]) and whole-body vibration + spinal flexion training groups (p = 0.02, pre-intervention: 49.8 [12.6], post-intervention: 47.9 [9.4]) showed significantly less stiffness post-intervention compared to pre-intervention.
conclusionsTrunk training performed in the spinal neutral position or spinal flexion position combined with whole-body vibration reduces erector spinae stiffness more effectively than simple spinal flexion training.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as a clinical trial (ID: jRCT1042240153; registration date: 20/12/2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.