ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
Genetic analysis of three patients from two unrelated Chinese families with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a rare early-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, spasticity, and sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. This disorder is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the sacsin (SACS) gene on chromosome 13q12.12. Three patients with ARSACS from two unrelated Chinese families were recruited for this study. Patient #1 was an 18-year-old male who had been walking unstably for 12 years. Patient #2, the younger sister of Patient #1, was a 5-year-old girl who had been walking unstably for 2 years. Patient #3 was a 19-year-old female who had been walking unstably and a tendency to fall for 17 years. For Patient #1, whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified a hemizygous variant c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in SACS (NM_014363.6), with the father being heterozygous, the mother wild-type, and Patient #2 hemizygous, as verified by Sanger sequencing. Additional copy number variant analysis of the WES data indicated that Patient #1 had a heterozygous gross deletion of chr13q12.12 (chr13:23,808,732 - 24,890,322). Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing results revealed that Patient #2 carried a chr13q12.12 deletion (chr13:23,520,000-24,940,000). Together with Sanger sequencing results, this gross deletion was speculated to have been inherited from the mother, further explaining the hemizygous state of c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) in Patients #1 and #2. Through WES, Patient #3 was identified as having suspected compound heterozygous variants of c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*), inherited from the father and mother, respectively, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing. This study identified three variants in SACS. The c.8310_8313delAGAT (p.Asp2771fs4*) is novel, whereas c.2881 C > T (p.Arg961*) and c.6409 C > T (p.Gln2137*) have been reported previously. Moreover, this study highlights the growing trend that ARSACS has become increasingly prevalent worldwide rather than being localized to a specific region or race. As an increasing number of patients with ARSACS are diagnosed, the genetic spectrum of ARSACS will gradually broaden, providing an accurate genetic basis for prenatal diagnosis of mothers in the years ahead, if possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.