Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319226›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Delaying Tackling in Youth Contact Sports: Moving toward a Safer Future or Softening the Game?

Joel M Garrett, Jonathon Headrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel M GarrettSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia. joel.garrett@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9198-4233
Jonathon HeadrickSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-1162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This current opinion article evaluates the rationale for delaying or modifying tackling in youth contact sports until age 12 years. There is growing concern that young athletes may be at heightened risk of sports-related concussions (SRC) and other injuries due to their developing brains and less-developed neuromuscular control. Recent studies exploring non-tackle formats, weight categories and body-checking restrictions demonstrate the potential benefits of reducing high-impact collisions at younger ages without the detrimental effects, i.e., increased SRC rate, when contact is introduced. Yet, critics may worry that delayed contact, such as tackling, may leave children unprepared for physical challenges, dampen sports engagement or fail to yield significant benefits in the long term. This article synthesises emerging evidence, highlights controversies and proposes future directions for policies and research. Ultimately, delaying tackling until the age of 12 years, paired with robust contact skill instruction and progression, may offer a safer path for children's long-term health and sports participation.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionYouth SportsAge FactorsChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID40319226
PMCPMC12460586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.