ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Delaying Tackling in Youth Contact Sports: Moving toward a Safer Future or Softening the Game?
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Use of In-Game Rule Changes as a Primary Prevention Approach to Reduce Injury Risk in Invasion Team Sports: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- The Contact Conundrum: Are We Introducing Contact at the Correct Time in Youth Sports?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This current opinion article evaluates the rationale for delaying or modifying tackling in youth contact sports until age 12 years. There is growing concern that young athletes may be at heightened risk of sports-related concussions (SRC) and other injuries due to their developing brains and less-developed neuromuscular control. Recent studies exploring non-tackle formats, weight categories and body-checking restrictions demonstrate the potential benefits of reducing high-impact collisions at younger ages without the detrimental effects, i.e., increased SRC rate, when contact is introduced. Yet, critics may worry that delayed contact, such as tackling, may leave children unprepared for physical challenges, dampen sports engagement or fail to yield significant benefits in the long term. This article synthesises emerging evidence, highlights controversies and proposes future directions for policies and research. Ultimately, delaying tackling until the age of 12 years, paired with robust contact skill instruction and progression, may offer a safer path for children's long-term health and sports participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.