ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Influence of various legwear during arterial stiffness measurement.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is widely used to measure arterial stiffness. The type of legwear worn by participants during the measurement may introduce variabilities because different fabric materials and thicknesses may disturb arterial waveforms. Therefore, we investigated the impact of common legwear on cfPWV measured using tonometry and oscillometry. We studied 50 adults (36 women) varying widely in age (19-78 years). We evaluated cfPWV using two commonly used devices that detect femoral pulses using tonometric and cuff-based oscillometric sensors. The participants wore thin medical shorts as the reference condition, khaki pants, sweatpants, and athletic shorts, with an optional bare skin condition (optimum control) with 10 min of rest between measurements. Both devices produced similar cfPWV among different legwear with no significant systematic differences. The range of cfPWV was 647-649 cm/s for the tonometric device and 482-500 cm/s for the oscillometric device across different types of legwear. Mean values of cfPWV measured with a bare skin condition did not differ significantly from other legwear. No data output rates were 13% for khaki, 6% for sweatpants, 3% for medical shorts, athletic shorts, and bare skin using the tonometry while the oscillometric device had a 0% no data output rate among all conditions. We concluded that relatively thin legwear did not appear to affect arterial stiffness as assessed by cfPWV. However, stiffer legwear, such as khaki pants, presents a challenge to detect femoral pulses when using a tonometric sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.