ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Adult-Trained Cardiac Sonographers: Essential Team Members in the Evaluation and Management of Unexpected Neonatal Critical Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) is essential in the management of neonates without a prenatal diagnosis. Adult-trained cardiac sonographers often perform initial neonatal transthoracic echocardiograms for outside interpretation. We sought to critically evaluate the accuracy and quality of these echocardiograms. Neonates treated at our center for postnatally diagnosed CCHD, who had an initial echocardiogram performed by an adult-trained sonographer at an outside birthing center were included. Each initial echocardiogram was evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale for diagnostic accuracy and quality, and a 3-point Likert scale assessing 5 standard echocardiogram views. Six paired graders independently assessed an equal distribution of echocardiograms. 52 echocardiograms from 4 states met all inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were aortic arch abnormalities (37%), followed by dTGA (19%), and TAPVR (17%). Ninety-eight percent of the original interpretations provided the correct primary diagnosis or high enough suspicion of the primary diagnosis to warrant appropriate escalation in care. Average scores of the echocardiograms were 3.13 ± 0.66 for diagnostic accuracy and 3.09 ± 0.54 for overall image quality. Average scores were highest for parasternal long-axis view (2.74 ± 0.31) and lowest for suprasternal notch (2.18 ± 0.46) and subcostal (2.07 ± 0.34) views. The average intraclass correlation between raters was > 0.9. Postnatal CCHD is discoverable by adult-trained sonographers with remote interpretation by pediatric cardiologists. Suprasternal notch and subcostal views are areas of educational opportunity. With appropriate support systems, adult-trained sonographers can be an invaluable asset in the early diagnosis and management of unexpected CCHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.