Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319163›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2026

Adult-Trained Cardiac Sonographers: Essential Team Members in the Evaluation and Management of Unexpected Neonatal Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Robert McRae, Nicholas Brown, Nelangi Pinto, Aarti Bhat, Plicy Perez-Kersey, Briana Olson, Cheyenne Hobbs, Amber Kelly, Amy Schultz, Brian Soriano and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert McRaeUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. Robert.McRae@SeattleChildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-2534
Nicholas BrownUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Nelangi PintoUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Aarti BhatUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Plicy Perez-KerseyUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Briana OlsonSeattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Cheyenne HobbsSeattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Amber KellySeattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Amy SchultzPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Brian SorianoUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Matthew StuderUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) is essential in the management of neonates without a prenatal diagnosis. Adult-trained cardiac sonographers often perform initial neonatal transthoracic echocardiograms for outside interpretation. We sought to critically evaluate the accuracy and quality of these echocardiograms. Neonates treated at our center for postnatally diagnosed CCHD, who had an initial echocardiogram performed by an adult-trained sonographer at an outside birthing center were included. Each initial echocardiogram was evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale for diagnostic accuracy and quality, and a 3-point Likert scale assessing 5 standard echocardiogram views. Six paired graders independently assessed an equal distribution of echocardiograms. 52 echocardiograms from 4 states met all inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were aortic arch abnormalities (37%), followed by dTGA (19%), and TAPVR (17%). Ninety-eight percent of the original interpretations provided the correct primary diagnosis or high enough suspicion of the primary diagnosis to warrant appropriate escalation in care. Average scores of the echocardiograms were 3.13 ± 0.66 for diagnostic accuracy and 3.09 ± 0.54 for overall image quality. Average scores were highest for parasternal long-axis view (2.74 ± 0.31) and lowest for suprasternal notch (2.18 ± 0.46) and subcostal (2.07 ± 0.34) views. The average intraclass correlation between raters was > 0.9. Postnatal CCHD is discoverable by adult-trained sonographers with remote interpretation by pediatric cardiologists. Suprasternal notch and subcostal views are areas of educational opportunity. With appropriate support systems, adult-trained sonographers can be an invaluable asset in the early diagnosis and management of unexpected CCHD.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEchocardiographyHeart Defects, CongenitalPatient Care TeamAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesCongenital heart diseaseEchocardiogram educationNeonatal echocardiographyRemote interpretationTelehealth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.