ArticleScientific reports2025
Transfer learning from inorganic materials to ivory detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Raman Spectral Classification with Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes the automatic identification of ivory using Raman spectroscopy data and deep neural network (DNN) models pre-trained on open-source data from inorganic minerals. The proposed approach uses transfer learning (TL) from foundation models trained on a larger inorganic (minerals) spectroscopy dataset (MLROD). The results demonstrate, for the first time, the ability to transfer machine learning (ML) models from a Raman spectroscopy dataset of geological substances to classify biological ivory samples. Current identification methods, such as DNA analysis and radiocarbon dating, are costly and destructive. Recently, it was demonstrated that the use of Raman spectroscopy, a laser-based, non-destructive technique, in combination with well-known statistical techniques, has the potential to differentiate between mammoth and elephant ivory. However, this previous study had a small sample size due to difficulties in obtaining large amounts of labeled ivory data. To date, there has been no reported work on ivory classification using DNNs, and only limited studies using Raman spectra. The work proposed in this paper suggests that ML can provide high levels of accuracy in the classification of Raman spectroscopy data from ivory samples of different elephant species (up to 99.7%). This has the potential to create a quick and inexpensive method of identifying legal and illegal types of ivory to aid in enforcement of ivory trade bans. This study also demonstrated that DNN models initially pre-trained on inorganic minerals (from the MLROD dataset) that were not finetuned on ivory data had a high accuracy rate of 92%, alleviating the need for large amounts of training data from ivory specimens. Finally, the approach proposed in this paper, provides insight into the decision making and interpretation of the results using prototype-based models. This novel work demonstrates that: (1) ML methods can provide highly accurate classification of ivory from different species of elephant using data obtained using Raman spectroscopy and providing insight into the decision making (2) TL enables re-purposing the models trained on larger mineral datasets of inorganic materials (such as MLROD) to discriminating between the classes of ivory, containing inorganic and organic biological components, for the first time transgressing between non-biological and biological samples (3) the proposed method allows both training from labelled samples of ivory and the identification of unknown ivory samples through prototype-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.