ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Effectiveness of a single COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an mRNA Vaccine for Tick-Borne Encephalitis: Selection of a Prototype Virus Strain.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Rational Design of Multiclade Coronavirus Spike Immunodominant Domain Nanoparticles to Elicit Broad Antibody Responses.Research square · 2025Article
- Rational Design of Multiclade Coronavirus Spike Immunodominant Domain Nanoparticles to Elicit Broad Antibody Responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- IL-24 in COVID-19 Patients: Correlations with Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biomarkers of mRNA vaccine efficacy derived from mechanistic modeling of tumor-immune interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBased on high population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from prior infection, vaccination, or both, in fall 2023, regulatory agencies globally authorized/approved a single mRNA XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine dose for individuals aged ≥5 years regardless of prior vaccination.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review on vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a single COVID-19 mRNA dose in individuals with a history of prior infection compared to individuals who were (i) SARS-CoV-2 naïve, (ii) unvaccinated with prior infection, and (iii) vaccinated with >1 dose with or without prior infection. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published January 2021-October 2023. Data were synthesized following Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guidelines; bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023453257).
resultsEighteen studies were eligible. None of these studies reported bivalent or XBB.1.5-adapted VE, and none reported VE for immunocompromised populations or children aged <5 years. Among those with prior infection, a single mRNA dose increased protection by 8-71% against infection (during Omicron BA.1, BA.4/5, or XBB predominance), 39-67% against symptomatic infection (BA.1, BA.2, or BA.4/5), and 25-60% against hospitalization or hospitalization or death (BA.1). VE of one dose was comparable to two doses among those with prior infection, and higher than following two doses without prior infection.
conclusionsA single dose of original mRNA COVID-19 vaccine provides similar protection to two doses for immunocompetent individuals aged ≥5 years in the current setting of high pre-existing immunity. This supports current recommendations for one dose to be given in advance of the respiratory season, regardless of history of infection or vaccination, with considerations for additional doses for certain populations including young children, older adults, and the immunocompromised.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.