ArticleScientific reports2025
Learning optimal image representations through noise injection for fine-grained search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, fine-grained image search has been an area of interest within the computer vision community. Many current works follow deep feature learning paradigms, which generally exploit the pre-trained convolutional layer's activations as representations and learn a low-dimensional embedding. This embedding is usually learned by defining loss functions based on local structure like triplet loss. However, triplet loss requires an expensive sampling strategy. In addition, softmax-based loss (when the problem is treated as a classification task) performs faster than triplet loss but suffers from early saturation. To this end, a novel approach is proposed to enhance fine-grained representation learning by incorporating noise injection in both input and features. At the input, input image is made noised and the goal is set to reduce the distance between the L2 normalized features of input image and its noisy version in the embedding space, relative to other instances. Concurrently, noise injection in the features acts as regularization, facilitating the acquisition of generalized features and mitigating model overfitting. The proposed approach is tested on three public datasets: Oxford flower-17, Cub-200-2011 and Cars-196, and achieves better retrieval results than other existing methods. In addition, we also tested our approach in the Zero-Shot setting and got favorable results compared to the prior methods on Cars-196 and Cub-200-2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.