ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of high-risk pregnancy based on machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-risk pregnancy prediction using Taguchi-optimized machine learning methods and TOPSIS-based model selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of preterm and low birth weight risk using a physiology based artificial neural network integrating hematological, dental, and periodontal index markers: a cross sectional study based on machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and precision medicine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Down Syndrome Risk Prediction in First Trimester Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determinants of early lactation failure in mothers of moderately preterm neonates: a multilevel analysis of survey data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in maternal and child health: Current applications, translational gaps, and future research priorities.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the application of machine learning algorithms in predicting high-risk pregnancy among expectant mothers, aiming to construct an efficient predictive model to improve maternal health management. The study is based on the maternal health risk dataset (MHRD) from Bangladesh, covering multiple hospitals, community clinics, and maternal healthcare centers, and encompassing health data from 1014 pregnant women. Six machine learning algorithms-multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine (SVM)-are employed to construct predictive models. It is worth noting that MLP demonstrates superior performance compared with the other five algorithms. By applying the MLP method, the study successfully established an efficient pregnancy risk prediction model. The model evaluation results indicate that it has high accuracy in predicting pregnancy risks, with an overall accuracy rate of 82%, and particularly high accuracy in high-risk predictions, reaching 91%. With the computational support of an NVIDIA GPU RTX3050Ti, the model demonstrated excellent data processing capabilities, capable of predicting and processing 500 sets of data items per second. This study not only showcases the enormous potential of machine learning technology in the healthcare field, especially in the rapid and accurate identification of high-risk pregnancies, providing a powerful decision-support tool for medical professionals, but also offers significant reference value for future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.