Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319062›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Focusing attention in working and long-term memory through dissociable mechanisms.

Dongyu Gong, Dejan Draschkow, Anna C Nobre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongyu GongDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dongyu.gong@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-3202
Dejan DraschkowDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. dejan.draschkow@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1354-4835
Anna C NobreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kia.nobre@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-2802

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation (McDonnell Foundation) 220020448Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 104571/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an experimental approach to compare how attentional orienting facilitates retrieval from spatial working memory (WM) and long-term memory (LTM), and how selective attention within these two memory types impacts incoming sensory information processing. In three experiments with healthy young adults, retrospective attention cues prioritize an item represented in WM or LTM. Participants then retrieve a memory item or perform a perceptual task. The retrocue is informative for the retrieval task but not for the perceptual task. We show that attentional orienting benefits performance for both WM and LTM, with stronger effects for WM. Eye-tracking reveals significant gaze shifts and microsaccades correlated with attention in WM, but no statistically significant gaze biases were found for LTM. Visual discrimination of unrelated visual stimuli is consistently improved for items matching attended WM locations. Similar effects occur at LTM locations but less consistently. The findings suggest at least partly dissociable attention-orienting processes for different memory types. Although our conclusions are necessarily constrained to the type of WM and LTM representations relevant to our task, they suggest that, under certain conditions, attentional prioritization in LTM can operate independently from WM. Future research should explore whether similar dissociations extend to non-spatial or more complex forms of LTM.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermAdolescentAdultCuesEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40319062
PMCPMC12049562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.