ArticleScientific reports2025
Plasma metabolomics signatures predict COVID-19 patient outcome at ICU admission comparable to clinical scores.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antioxidant and oxidative enzymes, genetic variants, and cofactors as prognostic biomarkers of COVID-19 severity and mortality: a systematic review.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 significantly impacts the human metabolome. This study aims to evaluate the predictive capability of a comprehensive module clustering approach in plasma metabolomics for identifying the risk of critical complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). We conducted a prospective monocenter study, gathering blood samples within 24 h of ICU admission, alongside clinical, biological, and demographic patient characteristics. Subsequently, we quantified patients' plasma metabolome using a comprehensive untargeted metabolomics approach. First, we stratified patients based on a composite outcome score indicating critical status. Analysis of potential predictors revealed that older patients with higher severity scores and pronounced alterations in key biological parameters are more likely to experience critical complications. Next, we identified 6,667 metabolic features clustered into 57 annotated metabolic modules across all patients by employing an integrative metabolomics approach. Furthermore, we identified the most differentially expressed metabolic modules related to patients' outcomes. Moreover, we defined the top five most predictive metabolites of critical status: homoserine, urobilinogen, methionine, xanthine and pipecolic acid. These five predictors alone demonstrated similar or superior performance compared to clinical and demographic variables in predicting patients' outcomes. This innovative metabolic module inference approach offers a valuable framework for identifying patients prone to complications upon ICU admission for COVID-19. Its potential applications extend to enhancing patient management across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.