SynthesisScientific reports2025
Meta-analysis of multimodal analgesia for reducing postoperative wound pain after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preemptive nalbuphine combined with subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic liver resection: a randomized controlled trial of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic hepatectomy.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Regional Blocks in the Era of the Opioid Crisis: Evaluating Their Opioid-Sparing Effect.Cureus · 2026Review
- Impact of multimodal analgesia nursing on postoperative pain and recovery outcomes after hepatectomy.Medicine · 2026Article
- Post-operative pain and patient satisfaction after multimodal analgesia: Questionnaire-based chart review.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Effect of the Evidence-Based and Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program in Patients After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Peripheral Nerve Blocks Following Open Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common primary liver malignancy, but only 20-30% of patients qualify for resection due to tumor stage and liver function. Postoperative wound pain is a critical concern that can impact patient recovery and hospital stay duration. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the efficacy of multimodal analgesia (MMA) in managing postoperative pain following hepatectomy for HCC. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, identifying relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without language or publication date restrictions. The inclusion criteria focused on adult patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy, comparing the effects of MMA with standard pain management protocols. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, and adverse events, with secondary outcomes addressing hospital stay duration. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, and a fixed or random-effects model was applied based on heterogeneity levels. Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating MMA's significant reduction in postoperative pain scores (weighted mean difference [WMD] = - 1.08, P < 0.001) and hospital stay duration (WMD = - 1.19 days, P < 0.01), with a lower incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.63, P < 0.01). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected. This meta-analysis shows that MMA effectively reduces postoperative pain, adverse events, and hospital stay in hepatectomy patients, including both open and laparoscopic procedures. Future studies should explore long-term outcomes and recovery optimization.Trial registration: CRD42024605076.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.