Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319017›Full record

ReviewCell death & disease2025

NDP52 and its emerging role in pathogenesis.

Krenare Bruqi, Flavie Strappazzon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death & disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Krenare BruqiUniv Lyon, Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Physiopathologie et Génétique du Neurone et du muscle, UMR5261, U1315, Institut Neuromyogène, Lyon, France.
Flavie StrappazzonUniv Lyon, Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Physiopathologie et Génétique du Neurone et du muscle, UMR5261, U1315, Institut Neuromyogène, Lyon, France. flavie.strappazzon@cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-7449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a pro-survival process that regulates the degradation and renewal of cellular components, making it a crucial mechanism for cellular homeostasis. There are selective forms of autophagy that are specific to a number of substrates, such as pathogens (bacteria or viruses), protein aggregates or excess/damaged organelles. These processes involve as key players autophagy receptors, that link the cargo to be degraded to the autophagic machinery. Among them, NDP52 (also known as CALCOCO2) has been described to act as a "bridge" between the autophagy machinery and (1) damaged mitochondria in the mitophagy process; (2) pathogens during xenophagy or (3) proteins in the process of aggrephagy. The aim of this review is to summarize the major functions of NDP52, and to highlight the existence of two human NDP52 variants that have been described as risk or protective factors for Crohn's disease or Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease patients, respectively. As these three diseases share common pathological features that lead to inflammation, such as mitochondria or gut microbiota dysfunctions, but also pathogenic infections, it seems clear that NDP52 could be a key player at the crossroad by acting indirectly on inflammation, and therefore a potential target for clinical applications and benefits.

Indexed as

Nuclear ProteinsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsAutophagyHumansMitochondriaMitophagyMultiple SclerosisCALCOCO2 protein, humanNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40319017
PMCPMC12049512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.