ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Development of machine learning-based mpox surveillance models in a learning health system.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public health surveillance and outbreak preparedness for mpox.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2026Review
- Uncloaking the black-box: the need for explainable artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Establishment of a postoperative delirium risk prediction model for elderly hip fracture patients based on machine learning algorithms.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop robust machine learning (ML)-based and deep learning (DL)-based models capable of detecting mpox cases for surveillance efforts using clinical notes.
methodsAs part of a learning health system initiative, we conducted a retrospective study of clinical encounters at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City. We included patients with mpox diagnoses confirmed by PCR testing between 15 May 2022 and 15 October 2022 and three matched controls for each case based on patient age, sex, race, ethnicity and visit month. We trained three mpox surveillance models using: (1) logistic regression with L1 regularisation (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)), (2) ClinicalBERT and (3) ClinicalLongformer. We evaluated model performance using precision, recall, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and recall at 80% precision (RP80).
resultsThe study included 228 PCR-confirmed mpox cases and 698 controls. LASSO regression outperformed the DL models with a precision, recall and F1 score of 0.93, AUROC of 0.97, AUPRC of 0.93 and RP80 of 0.89. ClinicalBERT achieved a precision of 0.88, recall of 0.89, F1 score of 0.88 and AUROC of 0.93. ClinicalLongformer achieved a precision of 0.87, recall of 0.88, F1 score of 0.87 and AUROC of 0.92. Phrases related to symptoms (eg, lesions and pain) were among the most predictive features in LASSO regression.
conclusionsML and DL models based on clinical notes show promise for identifying mpox cases. In this study, LASSO regression outperformed DL models and excelled in minimising false positives. These findings highlight the potential for ML and DL methods to support case surveillance for mpox and other infectious diseases. These methods may also prove helpful for flagging missed or delayed diagnoses as part of continuous quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.