Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40318774›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025

Impact of satiety on palatable food associative learning and consumption in male and female adult rats.

Rebecca Shteyn, Danielle S Lafferty, Gorica D Petrovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adolescent mice exhibit lower reward sensitivity than adults.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca ShteynDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Danielle S LaffertyDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Gorica D PetrovichDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. Electronic address: gorica.petrovich@bc.edu.

Funding

Forebrain Circuits and Control of Feeding Behavior by Learned CuesR01DK085721 · NIDDK · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI PETROVICH, GORICA D · 2010 to 2020
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hedonic and memory mechanisms can stimulate food cravings and consumption in sated individuals, promoting binge eating and obesity. Despite that, how satiety impacts learning and memory about cues for palatable food in males and females remains unclear. This is the first study to directly compare food associative learning, extinction, and memory renewal between hungry and sated subjects of both sexes. Food-restricted and sated male and female adult Sprague Dawley rats were trained in Pavlovian cue-food conditioning sessions, followed by cue-only presentations during extinction in a different context. They were then tested for renewal of conditioned responding to the food cue by return to the conditioning context. Conditioned responding was assessed through foodcup approach behavior. These rats were also tested for consumption of palatable food and chow before and after the learning and memory protocol. Sated rats demonstrated learning, extinction, and renewal of conditioned responding, indicating that physiological hunger is not required for learning and memory of palatable food cues. There were differences during cue-food acquisition, food-deprived rats learned faster and reached a plateau in conditioned responding sooner than sated rats. However, there were no differences after the fourth session, when sated rats reached the same level of responding as the food-deprived rats. There were sex differences during early acquisition under sated but not hungry states. Sated females had higher conditioned responding than sated males, while food-deprived rats of both sexes responded similarly. Extinction and renewal tests showed that both hungry and sated rats successfully decreased and subsequently renewed their conditioned responses. These results demonstrate the durability of learning and persistence of food-cue memory regardless of hunger state. Consumption tests found that all rats prefer palatable food compared to chow. Females, particularly when sated, consumed more palatable food compared to males. Higher palatable food consumption and learning in females suggest an enhanced sensitivity to palatable rewards. Correlation analyses found a positive relation between the amounts of food rats consumed and their conditioned responding in both sexes. These results demonstrate robust associative learning and memory under satiety and add evidence of sex differences in hedonic food motivation.

Indexed as

Association LearningEatingFeeding BehaviorSatiationSex CharacteristicsAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleFoodHungerMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyConditioningEatingHedonic consumptionHungerPalatable foodSatietySex differences

Identifiers

PMID40318774
PMCPMC12146044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.