ReviewNeuroRehabilitation2025
Are Assistive Technologies Effective in the Management of Contractures in People with Stroke? - A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary.
Review in NeuroRehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundPatients who have had a stroke are at risk of contractures, a shortening of muscles and other soft tissues. Muscle stretching, manually or delivered by other means, is a common strategy to manage contractures following stroke. A Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. has investigated the effectiveness of assistive technology defined as a mechanical, electrical, or electromechanical device used to stretch or lengthen a muscle statically, dynamically, or cyclically for preventing or reducing contractures.ObjectiveTo summarize the Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. and comment on it from a rehabilitation perspective.MethodsThe Cochrane Review authors identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) which investigated the use of electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke. RCTs had to compare these assistive technologies with no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology. Passive range of motion (PROM) was the primary outcome.ResultsSeven studies (294 participants) were included. Data from five studies (252 participants) comparing assistive technologies with routine care were meta-analyzed. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of assistive technology on PROM, adverse events and other outcomes.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support clinical decisions about the effectiveness of assistive technology in the management of contractures in people with stroke. Rehabilitation professionals should select strategies for management of contractures in patients with stroke based on an expert assessment of a patient's individual needs and preferences, and ensure regular re-assessment. High quality research is necessary in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.