ArticleSchizophrenia research2025
Digital phenotyping evidence for the reduced positivity offset as a mechanism underlying anhedonia among individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.
Article in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subjective Perceptions of Digital Phenotyping Measures of Negative Symptoms Among Individuals At Clinical High Risk for Psychosis and Their Relatives.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Article
- AI-enabled passive digital phenotyping of experiential negative symptoms in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a narrative review on the path from sensing to clinical endpoints.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Methodological challenges and emerging solutions for outcome measurement.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior studies suggest that the "anhedonia paradox" in schizophrenia (i.e., discrepant results indicating intact hedonic reactivity despite reduced frequency of pleasure-seeking activity) can be explained by a reduction in the "positivity offset" (i.e., a reduction in the normative tendency to experience greater positive than negative affect during low arousal neutral contexts that promote reward-seeking behavior). In the current study, we examined whether the positivity offset is relevant to explaining anhedonia and liability for psychosis among individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) (i.e., individuals exhibiting attenuated hallucinations or delusions that cause distress and functional decline). Mathematical modeling approaches from Cacioppo's Evaluative Space Model were applied to six days of digital phenotyping data collected in daily life among 100 individuals at CHR and 57 healthy controls (CN). Participants reported levels of positive emotion, negative emotion, and arousal throughout the day via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys while accelerometry was passively recorded. EMA surveys were used to calculate the positivity offset and examine associations with real-world motivated behavior. Results indicated that the positivity offset was present among individuals at CHR, but diminished compared to CN. Importantly, smaller positivity offset scores were associated with greater clinically rated anhedonia, particularly among CHR cases with comorbid mood disorder diagnoses. Findings suggest that reductions in the positivity offset are a mechanism underlying anhedonia across phases of psychotic illness and represent a novel treatment target that is relevant for the treatment of negative symptoms and prevention of psychotic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.