ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2025
Adaptive Restraints to Accelerate Geometry Optimizations of Large Biomolecular Systems.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulations of solvent effects on excited state dynamics of p-DAPA, a red single benzene-based fluorophore.The Journal of chemical physics · 2026Article
- Strategic Design of Fluorescent Perylene-Modified Nucleic Acid Monomers: Position-, Phosphorylation-, and Linker-Dependent Control of Electron Transfer.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical geometry optimizations of large-scale biological systems, such as enzymes, proteins, membranes, and solutions, are typically computationally expensive to the point of being cost-prohibitive. By convention, an approximation is made to such calculations that atoms beyond a certain distance from the QM region provide only negligible improvements to the resulting optimization energy and geometry, and as such are restrained to reduce the number of degrees of freedom. These constraints are normally applied beyond a user-defined radius. Here we describe a new method of geometry optimization acceleration and automation which generates adaptive gradient-based restraints for QM/MM optimizations, leading to significantly faster optimizations and generally lower relative energies. The restraints are determined by an algorithm rather than a user, and can adapt to directional optimizations as well as differences in starting geometry. This flexibility is key to finding excited state minima and minimum energy conical intersections (MECIs) in complex protein environments. This algorithm was implemented as an external Python tool for use alongside TeraChem, with a modular interface that can be straightforwardly applied to other QM/MM packages. We tested on a green fluorescent protein (rsEGFP2) and two red fluorescent proteins (FusionRed, mScarlet) in water and a proton-swapping aspartic acid pair in explicit water. We are able to produce a nearly 50% reduction in computational time while maintaining appropriately optimized geometries and relative energies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.