Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
Mortality risk following ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: Observational study in England, 2000-2021.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling Heart Failure: Gender-Specific Insights and Innovations in Women's Cardiac Health.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Mortality risk following ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: Observational study in England, 2000-2021.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the association between type 2 diabetes and all-cause mortality in people with ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure (HF).
methodsUsing the Clinical Practice Research Datalink primary care data, linked to hospital and mortality records, we identified newly diagnosed adults with type 2 diabetes between 2000 and 2021 and matched to up to four people without diabetes by sex, year of birth and general practice. We defined incident HF events as ischaemic if they followed an ischaemic heart disease event; otherwise, as non-ischaemic. We calculated sex-specific incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical confounders) for all-cause mortality following HF diagnosis, comparing people with type 2 diabetes to those without diabetes.
resultsIn 73 344 people with HF (18 296 [24.9%] with ischaemic HF), 9584 and 31 800 deaths occurred in those with ischaemic and non-ischaemic HF, respectively. Age-standardised mortality rates following ischaemic HF were higher in people with type 2 diabetes (19.2 [95% CI: 18.1-20.3] and 20.4 [19.5-21.4] per 100 person-years in women and men, respectively) compared to those without diabetes (15.1 [14.4-15.8] and 16.5 [15.9-17.1], respectively). Corresponding rates in those with non-ischaemic HF were: 19.5 (19.0-20.1), 22.0 (21.4-22.6), 16.6 (16.2-17.0) and 19.4 (18.9-19.8). The HR for mortality was similar among HF types and between men and women: for ischaemic HF, 1.26 (1.17-1.36) in women and 1.23 (1.15-1.31) in men; for non-ischaemic HF, 1.24 (1.19-1.29) and 1.20 (1.15-1.25), respectively.
conclusionOur findings indicate broadly similar mortality rates in people with ischaemic and non-ischaemic HF, with higher rates in people with type 2 diabetes compared to those without diabetes in both women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.