ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
How to use luspatercept and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a Systematic Review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- A 2026 update on myelodysplastic neoplasms: current state, challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Advances in Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Clinical Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- How to use luspatercept and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Malaria and dyserythropoiesis: a mini review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaemia is the most common cytopenia in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), significantly impacting quality of life and morbidity. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the first-line treatment for anaemia in lower risk (LR)-MDS. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved epoetin alpha for LR-MDS-related anaemia in 2017, based on evidence from a unique randomized Phase 3 trial and accumulated evidence in many trials, providing support to an already widely utilized therapeutic option. Luspatercept, a more recently approved agent, is a ligand trap for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway, whose activation is associated with impaired terminal erythroid maturation in MDS. Luspatercept facilitates late-stage erythroid differentiation, improving transfusion-dependent anaemia in LR-MDS, and has shown activity after ESA failure in MDS-ring sideroblasts (RS) and in all subtypes of MDS ESA naïve transfusion-dependent patients. Due to the recent approval of luspatercept also in ESA naïve LR-MDS, it has become crucial to determine the optimal treatment algorithm for anaemic LR-MDS, before and after transfusion dependence. ESAs and luspatercept are characterized by distinct mechanisms of action, and their integration into treatment strategies is already possible, but requires further evidence to maximize efficacy and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.