Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317951›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2025

Can Unicellular Organisms Sequester a Germline? The Yeast-Germline Hypothesis.

Bhavya Sree Vadlamudi, Duur K Aanen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bhavya Sree VadlamudiPlant Sciences Group, Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Duur K AanenPlant Sciences Group, Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-1617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germline mutations can affect future generations, while somatic mutations cannot. This germline-soma distinction does not seem to make sense for unicellular organisms. We challenge this view, arguing that baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has a germline. Under aerobic conditions yeast cells use mainly fermentation of glucose to produce ethanol. Only when glucose is exhausted, cells switch to full respiration of the produced ethanol. We hypothesize that only a subset of the cells continue dividing and switch to respiration. A change from exponential to linear growth is consistent with asymmetrical cell division, where a senescing mother cell produces quiescent daughter cells. We thus propose that most cells produced during fermentation are "somatic," that is, they rapidly lose reproductive capacity, while the cells continuing to divide constitute the germline, as they exclusively produce rejuvenated quiescent cells. We discuss biased DNA-template strand inheritance by the mother cell as a potential adaptive explanation for germline sequestration to reduce the mutation rate.

Indexed as

Germ CellsGerm-Line MutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCell DivisionEthanolFermentationGlucoseMutation RateEthanolGlucoseevolutiongermlinegermline‐sequestrationimmortal strand hypothesisSaccharomyces cerevisiaesomaWeismann's germplasm theory

Identifiers

PMID40317951
PMCPMC12101049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.