SynthesisAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2025
A Systematic Review of the Application of Graph Neural Networks to Extract Candidate Genes and Biological Associations.
Synthesis in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of high throughput technologies has resulted in the collection of large quantities of genomic and transcriptomic data. However, identifying disease-associated genes or networks from these data has remained an ongoing challenge. In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising analytical tool, but it is not well understood which characteristics of these models result in improved performance. We conducted a systematic search and review of publications that used GNNs to identify disease-associated biological interactions. Information was extracted about model characteristics and performance with the goal of examining the relationship between these factors and performance. Data leakage was found in 31% of these models. For node level tasks, univariate positive associations were identified between model accuracy and use of hyper parameter optimization, data leakage via hyperparameter optimization, test set size, and total dataset size. Among graph level tasks, an increase in AUC was identified in association with testing method and a decrease with optimization reporting. Data leakage may pose an issue for GNN-based approaches; the adoption of best practice guidelines and consistent reporting of model design would be beneficial for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.