Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317893›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2025

A Systematic Review of the Application of Graph Neural Networks to Extract Candidate Genes and Biological Associations.

Ankita Saxena, Bridgette Nixon, Amelia Boyd, James Evans, Stephen V Faraone

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankita SaxenaDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, State University of New York-Norton College of Medicine at Upstate Medical University, New York, USA.
Bridgette NixonCollege of Medicine, MD Program, Norton College of Medicine at SUNY Upstate Medical University, New York, USA.
Amelia BoydCollege of Medicine, MD Program, Norton College of Medicine at SUNY Upstate Medical University, New York, USA.
James EvansHealth Sciences Library, State University of new York-Upstate Medical University, New York, USA.
Stephen V FaraoneDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, State University of New York-Norton College of Medicine at Upstate Medical University, New York, USA.

Funding

SLE Treatment with N-acetylcysteineU01AR076092 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI Michael P McDermott, Andras Perl · 2020 to 2026
$7.9M
Person-centered diagnostics and prediction for child dysregulatory psychopathology using novel phenotypesU01MH135970 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KARALUNAS, SARAH LYN, NAGEL, BONNIE J. · 2024 to 2025
$6.5M
Discoveries in ADHD genomics: Help or hype in clinical settings?R01MH116037 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DOYLE, ALYSA E · 2019 to 2023
$4.4M
Polygenic and environmental contributions to ADHD trajectory and outcome from childhood through adolescenceR01MH131685 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael A Mooney, Molly Nikolas · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Leveraging computational strategies to disentangle the genetic and neural underpinnings of ADHD and its associated cognitive systemsR01MH130899 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Tian Ge · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
Integrating Genetic, Neuroimaging, Transcriptomic, and Clinical Risk Factors as Multivariate Predictors of Cognitive Deterioration in Alzheimer's Disease.R01NS128535 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI HESS, JONATHAN · 2022 to 2024
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR076092NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116037NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130899NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131685NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH135970NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of high throughput technologies has resulted in the collection of large quantities of genomic and transcriptomic data. However, identifying disease-associated genes or networks from these data has remained an ongoing challenge. In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising analytical tool, but it is not well understood which characteristics of these models result in improved performance. We conducted a systematic search and review of publications that used GNNs to identify disease-associated biological interactions. Information was extracted about model characteristics and performance with the goal of examining the relationship between these factors and performance. Data leakage was found in 31% of these models. For node level tasks, univariate positive associations were identified between model accuracy and use of hyper parameter optimization, data leakage via hyperparameter optimization, test set size, and total dataset size. Among graph level tasks, an increase in AUC was identified in association with testing method and a decrease with optimization reporting. Data leakage may pose an issue for GNN-based approaches; the adoption of best practice guidelines and consistent reporting of model design would be beneficial for future studies.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesNeural Networks, ComputerComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGraph Neural NetworksHumansgraph learninggraph neural networksmachine learningmultiomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40317893
PMCPMC12335376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.