ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025
Pregnancy After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison of Antenatal Care Practices With the 2019 International Consensus Recommendations in Queensland, Australia.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical practice guidelines recommend additional monitoring in pregnancy for women post-bariatric surgery, to reduce the risk of maternal and infant complications.
aimTo examine if pregnancy care post-bariatric surgery at an Australian quaternary public hospital is consistent with guidelines and to report on perinatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective audit of medical records and perinatal outcomes from post-bariatric surgery pregnancies from June 2016 to February 2021 was completed. Micronutrient monitoring and supplementation practices, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening, gestational weight gain (GWG) and fetal growth (FG) monitoring were compared with guidelines. Perinatal outcomes were compared with Queensland and Australian population data.
resultsEighty-three women meeting the inclusion criteria delivered 86 infants. Twenty percent (n = 16) had recommended GDM screening, 86% (n = 71) recommended FG monitoring at 12-weeks and 98% (n = 81) at 20-weeks, but only 24% (n = 20) had monthly monitoring from viability. GWG monitoring was 95% (n = 79) in the second trimester and 94% (n = 78) in the third trimester. Monitoring rates were highest for iron, and lowest for copper and selenium. Adverse infant outcomes for length of stay, neonatal intensive and special care admissions and caesarean section were significantly higher than the Queensland and Australian populations (all p < 0.05).
conclusionAdherence with consensus recommendations aligning to standard antenatal monitoring for the general population was high, but additional monitoring for post-bariatric surgery specific care was lower. The evidence suggesting increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes highlights the importance of consistency and adherence with post-bariatric surgery specific care for this group during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.