ArticleMedical physics2025
Universal mapping and patient-specific prior implicit neural representation for enhanced high-resolution MRI in MRI-guided radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- S2V-DREME: a time-resolved slice-to-volume MR image reconstruction framework with dynamic reconstruction and motion estimation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Accurate estimation of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters based on implicit neural representation.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Band-limited implicit neural representations for diffusion-weighted imaging denoising.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Universal mapping and patient-specific prior implicit neural representation for enhanced high-resolution MRI in MRI-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI), known for its superior soft tissue contrast, plays a crucial role in radiation therapy (RT). The introduction of MR-LINAC systems enables the use of on-board MRI for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) on the day of treatment to maximize treatment accuracy. PURPOSE: Due to patient comfort considerations and the time constraints associated with adaptive radiation therapy (ART), reducing the resolution of on-board MRI to accelerate image acquisition can improve efficiency, especially when acquiring multiple MRIs with different contrast weightings. However, the low-resolution imaging makes it challenging to identify key anatomical structures, potentially limiting treatment precision. To address this challenge, super-resolution of on-board MRI has emerged as a viable solution.
methodsTo achieve super-resolution for on-board MRI, this study proposed a universal anatomical mapping and patient-specific prior implicit neural representation (USINR) framework. Unlike traditional methods that interpolate solely based on individual on-board MR images, USINR can fully utilize the patient-specific anatomical information from a high-resolution prior MRI. In addition, USINR leverages knowledge about universal mapping between population-based prior MRIs and on-board MRIs, elevating the upper bound of super-resolution performance and enabling faster on-board fine-tuning.
resultsUSINR was evaluated on three datasets, including IXI, BraTS, and an in-house abdominal dataset. It achieved state-of-the-art performance on all of them. For example, on the BraTS dataset, USINR was trained on 1151 paired training samples (for universal anatomical mapping) and tested on 50 patients. It achieved average SSIM, PSNR, and LPIPS scores of 0.9656, 37.12, and 0.0214, respectively, significantly outperforming the published state-of-the-art method SuperFormer, whose corresponding scores were 0.9488, 35.83, and 0.0388. Furthermore, USINR can complete patient-specific training in less than one minute, rendering it a favorable solution in time-constrained ART workflows. In addition to large-scale dataset evaluations, a case study was conducted on an in-house patient at UT Southwestern Medical Center. This case study included two MRI scans (a prior scan for plan simulation and a new one for on-board imaging) from a single patient with a long interval between two scans, during which the tumor size underwent a significant change. Despite these substantial anatomical changes between prior and on-board imaging, USINR was able to accurately capture the change in tumor size, highlighting its robustness for clinical applications.
conclusionsBy combining knowledge of universal anatomical mapping with patient-specific prior implicit neural representation, USINR offers a novel and reliable approach for MRI super-resolution. This method enhances the spatial resolution of MR images with minimal processing time, thereby balancing the need for image quality and the efficiency of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.