Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317736›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

Gaps in Primary Care Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Timothy S Anderson, John Z Ayanian, Shoshana J Herzig, Jeffrey Souza, Bruce E Landon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy S AndersonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-275X
John Z AyanianInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shoshana J HerzigDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey SouzaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bruce E LandonDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Leila S. Agha · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
Optimizing prescribing decisions for hospitalized older adults with chronic conditionsK76AG074878 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Timothy S Anderson · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
American Heart Association 940950NIA NIH HHS K76 AG074878NIA NIH HHS K76AG074878NIA NIH HHS L30 AG060493NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952NIA NIH HHS P01AG032952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely primary care follow-up after hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery and coordinate care. Whether follow-up differs for vulnerable populations, such as those with frailty and those discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prior to returning home, is not known.

methodsRetrospective cohort study using a 100% sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospital to home or from hospital to SNF and then home, between 2010 and 2022. The primary outcome was the receipt of a primary care visit within 30 days of return to home, measured overall and stratified by disposition (discharged home vs. to SNF then home) and by frailty (defined by a claims-based frailty index). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes in outcomes over time, overall and stratified by disposition and frailty.

resultsThe cohort included 94,248,326 discharges (80.1% age ≥ 65 years, 55.1% female, 36.7% frail) of which 21.5% were discharged to SNF and then home. Between 2010 and 2022, primary care follow-up increased from 51.5% to 57.5% for patients discharged directly home and from 24.3% to 28.4% for patients discharged to SNF then home. In adjusted analyses, compared to those discharged directly home, patients discharged to SNF and then home had an 8.2% point (pp) (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.9) lower predicted probability of ambulatory follow-up in 2022. Among patients discharged directly home, no difference was evident in follow-up between frail and non-frail patients (54.6% vs. 54.1%); difference 0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.0). In contrast, among patients discharged to SNF then home, frail patients had a lower predicted probability of follow-up (42.8% vs. 48.9%); difference - 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0 to -5.2).

conclusionsFrail patients and patients requiring a short-term SNF stay after hospitalization are less likely to receive timely follow-up upon return to home than other patient groups.

Indexed as

AftercareMedicarePatient DischargePrimary Health CareSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesfrailtyhospitalizationMedicareskilled nursing facilitiestransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID40317736
PMCPMC12303739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.