Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317503›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Thorax-encompassing multi-modality PET/CT deep learning model for resected lung cancer prognostication: A retrospective, multicenter study.

Jaryd R Christie, Perrin Romine, Karen Eddy, Delphine L Chen, Omar Daher, Mohamed Abdelrazek, Richard A Malthaner, Mehdi Qiabi, Rahul Nayak, Paul Kinahan and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jaryd R ChristieDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Perrin RomineSwedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Karen EddyBaines Imaging Research Laboratory, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
Delphine L ChenClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Omar DaherDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mohamed AbdelrazekDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Richard A MalthanerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mehdi QiabiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rahul NayakDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul KinahanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Viswam S NairClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sarah A MattonenDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

TRAINING IN CANCER BIOLOGY &TRANSPLANTATIONT32CA009515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCY ELLEN DAVIDSON, Effie W Petersdorf · 1985 to 2026
$16.2M
Cancer Research Society 152218Discovery Grants program 2020-06498Gerald C. Baines FoundationLawson Health Research Institute's Internal Research Fund (IRF)London Health Sciences FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNCI NIH HHS T32 CA009515NCI NIH HHS T32CA009515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically receive surgery as their primary form of treatment. However, studies have shown that a high proportion of these patients will experience a recurrence after their resection, leading to an increased risk of death. Cancer staging is currently the gold standard for establishing a patient's prognosis and can help clinicians determine patients who may benefit from additional therapy. However, medical images which are used to help determine the cancer stage, have been shown to hold unutilized prognostic information that can augment clinical data and better identify high-risk NSCLC patients. There remains an unmet need for models to incorporate clinical, pathological, surgical, and imaging information, and extend beyond the current staging system to assist clinicians in identifying patients who could benefit from additional therapy immediately after surgery. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine whether a deep learning model (DLM) integrating FDG PET and CT imaging from the thoracic cavity along with clinical, surgical, and pathological information can predict NSCLC recurrence-free survival (RFS) and stratify patients into risk groups better than conventional staging. MATERIALS AND

methodsSurgically resected NSCLC patients enrolled between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed from two academic institutions (local institution: 305 patients; external validation: 195 patients). The thoracic cavity (including the lungs, mediastinum, pleural interfaces, and thoracic vertebrae) was delineated on the preoperative FDG PET and CT images and combined with each patient's clinical, surgical, and pathological information. Using the local cohort of patients, a multi-modal DLM using these features was built in a training cohort (n = 225), tuned on a validation cohort (n = 45), and evaluated on testing (n = 35) and external validation (n = 195) cohorts to predict RFS and stratify patients into risk groups. The area under the curve (AUC), Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank test were used to assess the prognostic value of the model. The DLM's stratification performance was compared to the conventional staging stratification.

resultsThe multi-modal DLM incorporating imaging, pathological, surgical, and clinical data predicted RFS in the testing cohort (AUC = 0.78 [95% CI:0.63-0.94]) and external validation cohort (AUC = 0.66 [95% CI:0.58-0.73]). The DLM significantly stratified patients into high, medium, and low-risk groups of RFS in both the testing and external validation cohorts (multivariable log-rank p < 0.001) and outperformed conventional staging. Conventional staging was unable to stratify patients into three distinct risk groups of RFS (testing: p = 0.94; external validation: p = 0.38). Lastly, the DLM displayed the ability to further stratify patients significantly into sub-risk groups within each stage in the testing (stage I: p = 0.02, stage II: p = 0.03) and external validation (stage I: p = 0.05, stage II: p = 0.03) cohorts.

conclusionThis is the first study to use multi-modality imaging along with clinical, surgical, and pathological data to predict RFS of NSCLC patients after surgery. The multi-modal DLM better stratified patients into risk groups of poor outcomes when compared to conventional staging and further stratified patients within each staging classification. This model has the potential to assist clinicians in better identifying patients that may benefit from additional therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyThoraxAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiescomputed tomographydeep learninglung cancermulti‐modalitypositron emission tomographyquantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID40317503
PMCPMC12149688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.