Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317474›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Movement behaviours of stocked and wild lake trout Salvelinus namaycush determined using acoustic telemetry.

Matthew H Futia, J Ellen Marsden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew H FutiaRubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-1488
J Ellen MarsdenRubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Funding

Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2013_BIN_44024Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2018_MAR_95003Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2023_MAR_95003Great Lakes Restoration Initiative GL-00E23010Lake Champlain Sea Grant, University of Vermont 000032817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hatchery practices are a critical tool of fisheries management to supplement diminished fish populations and restore extirpated species. However, stocking programs that successfully restore self-sustaining populations are rare. Unintentional artificial selection and domestication of hatchery-reared fish are potential limitations to the success of stocked individuals by selecting for behaviours that are poorly suited for natural conditions. Here, we compared seasonal movement behaviours between an established population of hatchery origin (stocked) and naturally produced (wild) lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Champlain at a range of sizes, including immature and mature fish. Fifty-six stocked and 34 wild lake trout were implanted with acoustic transmitters, including 45 transmitters with temperature and pressure (depth) sensors, to evaluate three-dimensional movement. Movement behaviours were assessed based on the number of distinct lake regions used, proportional time spent among lake regions, average daily distance travelled and depth distribution. Overall, horizontal and vertical movements were similar between stocked and wild lake trout across sizes, although individuals tended to occupy shallower depths at larger sizes. Seasonal differences in movement behaviours were observed and in some cases were dependent on origin. For all lake trout, average daily movement was greatest during fall and least during summer. Depth occupied, however, had an opposite trend, with the deepest average depths during summer and shallowest during fall and winter. The proportion of time spent among lake regions and variability in depth occupied also varied seasonally but only for wild fish, and included less time spent in individual regions and greater depth variability during fall compared to other seasons. While origin had insignificant effects in most models we evaluated, model predictions consistently suggested stocked lake trout had slightly smaller movements than wild fish. These results suggest that hatchery practices may have long-term, unintended effects on fish behaviour yet overall differences are likely subtle.

Indexed as

TroutAcousticsAnimalsFisheriesLakesMovementSeasonsTelemetryacoustic telemetryLake Champlainlake troutmovement behaviourstocking

Identifiers

PMID40317474
PMCPMC12360149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.