Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317437›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2025

The use of machine learning in transarterial chemoembolisation/transarterial embolisation for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Lakshya Soni, Jasen Soopramanien, Amish Acharya, Hutan Ashrafian, Stamatia Giannarou, Nicos Fotiadis, Ara Darzi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lakshya SoniInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.soni@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-1054
Jasen SoopramanienQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Amish AcharyaInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hutan AshrafianInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Stamatia GiannarouHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicos FotiadisRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. nicos.fotiadis@rmh.nhs.uk.
Ara DarziInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Royal Society URF\R\201014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Intermediate-stage HCC is often treated with either transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) or transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE). Integrating machine learning (ML) offers the possibility of improving treatment outcomes through enhanced patient selection. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of ML models in improving the precision and efficacy of both TACE and TAE for intermediate-stage HCC. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for studies applying ML models to TACE and TAE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Seven studies involving 4,017 patients were included. All included studies were from China. Various ML models, including deep learning and radiomics, were used to predict treatment response, yielding a high predictive accuracy (AUC 0.90). However, study heterogeneity limited comparisons. While ML shows potential in predicting treatment outcomes, further research with standardised protocols and larger, multi-centre trials is needed for clinical integration.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticEmbolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningHumansNeoplasm StagingTreatment OutcomeCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInterventional RadiologyMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40317437
PMCPMC12263724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.