ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2025
The Therapeutic Alliance in Refugee Mental Health and Psychosocial Support: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The therapeutic alliance-a collaborative relationship between mental health/psychosocial support (MHPSS) providers and clients-has consistently demonstrated positive impacts on mental health outcomes. This narrative review focuses on the therapeutic alliance within the context of refugee clients, who face unique challenges stemming from forced displacement, trauma, and systemic barriers. Utilizing a systematic search and thematic synthesis, 20 studies published between 2014 and 2024 were analyzed to address four key questions: the state of knowledge, the role of interpreters, strategies for improvement, and gaps in research. Findings highlight significant challenges in building alliances with refugee clients due to cultural and linguistic differences, power dynamics, and trauma-related distrust. The presence of interpreters transforms the traditional dyadic alliance into a triadic relationship, introducing both benefits and complexities. Interpreters act as co-constructors of the alliance, requiring strong collaboration and role negotiation with providers. Recommendations for strengthening the alliance include flexible therapeutic boundaries, advocacy integration, continuity of care, and tailored training for providers and interpreters. Despite the growing body of research, gaps remain in understanding non-verbal communication, virtual care dynamics, and the perspectives of clients discontinuing therapy. This review emphasizes the need for a paradigm shift recognizing clients, providers, and interpreters as equal partners in therapeutic processes, alongside further exploration of emerging contexts such as telehealth and refugee-led MHPSS initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.