ReviewFamilial cancer2025
A series of reviews in familial cancer: genetic cancer risk in context variants of uncertain significance in MMR genes: which procedures should be followed?
Review in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation structures for sequence variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in mismatch repair (MMR) genes remains a major challenge in managing Lynch syndrome and other hereditary cancer syndromes. This review outlines recommended VUS classification procedures, encompassing foundational and specialized methodologies tailored for MMR genes by expert organizations, including InSiGHT and ClinGen's Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP). Key approaches include: (1) functional data, encompassing direct assays measuring MMR proficiency such as in vitro MMR assays, deep mutational scanning, and MMR cell-based assays, as well as techniques like methylation-tolerant assays, proteomic-based approaches, and RNA sequencing, all of which provide critical functional evidence supporting variant pathogenicity; (2) computational data/tools, including in silico meta-predictors and models, which contribute to robust VUS classification when integrated with experimental evidence; and (3) enhanced variant detection to identify the actual causal variant through whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing to detect pathogenic variants missed by traditional methods. These strategies improve diagnostic precision, support clinical decision-making for Lynch syndrome, and establish a flexible framework that can be applied to other OMIM-listed genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.