Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317397›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2025

Internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-Gauge wide angle viewing system and flute needle for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Lijun Xie, Gang Qiao, Xiaojuan Zhang, Ziyan Tang, Qiangxing Zou, Chunmei He, Kui Cao, Wanjiang Dong, Wenyong Liao, Dongbin Chen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lijun XieMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Gang QiaoMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China. qiaogang3@163.com.
Xiaojuan ZhangMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Ziyan TangMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Qiangxing ZouMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Chunmei HeMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Kui CaoMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Wanjiang DongMianyang Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China.
Wenyong LiaoGuangyuan Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Guangyuan, 628000, Sichuan, China.
Dongbin ChenGuangyuan Wanjiang Eye Hospital, Guangyuan, 628000, Sichuan, China.

Funding

Mianyang Health Commission Scientific Research Project No.202263Sichuan Medical Research Fund S20018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects and advantages of internal drainage of subretinal fluid using a 27-gauge wide-angle viewing system(WAVS) and a flute needle compared with external drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) during scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

methodsIn this prospective randomized case series at two hospitals, we evaluated 43 eyes of 43 patients with RRD who were divided into two groups, A and B. Twenty-two eyes (22 patients) in Group A underwent internal drainage of subretinal fluid with a 27-gauge WAVS and a flute needle, whereas 21 eyes (21 patients) in Group B underwent external drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling surgery. The duration of surgery, rates of retinal reattachment, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOPs), occurrence of recurrent RRD, and risk factors of intraoperative or postoperative complications, including subretinal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent subretinal fluid, postoperative retinal tear, choroidal detachment, vitreous loss, vitreous and retinal incarceration, cystoid macular edema, cataract, glaucoma, and endophthalmitis, of both groups were collected and compared. We followed up these patients for six months after surgery.

resultsThe mean operating time of Group A (53.36 ± 6.19 min) was significantly shorter than Group B (61.24 ± 6.84 min) (P = 0.00). The final anatomical success rates were 100%(22/22) and 90.48%(19/21) in Group A and B, respectively (P = 0.14). All detached retinas in Group A reattached before the final follow-up, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were detected. In Group B, 2(9.52%, 2/21) underwent a second vitrectomy surgery because of subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of the subretinal fluid. However, the retinas of both eyes reattached at the end of the final follow-up. However, there were two (9.52%, 2/21) other eyes' retinas in Group B that had not completely reattached due to persistent subretinal fluid at the end of this study. The final mean BCVA of Group A (0.21 ± 0.15) was significantly superior to that of Group B(0.39 ± 0.35)(P = 0.04). The intraocular pressure in all the patients was within the normal range throughout the study.

conclusionAlthough limited by the small sample size, this study suggests that internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-gauge WAVS and flute needle showed advantages superior to external drainage of subretinal fluid in scleral buckling surgery, including increased efficiency and decreased amount of SRF, shortened duration of persistent subretinal fluid, and reduced rate of subretinal hemorrhage.

Indexed as

DrainageNeedlesRetinal DetachmentScleral BucklingSubretinal FluidAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity27-gauge wide angle viewing systemFlute needleInternal drainageRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentScleral bucklingSubretinal fluid drainage

Identifiers

PMID40317397
PMCPMC12049303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.