ArticleBiodegradation2025
An exploration of bacterial consortia in chlorpyrifos degradation, soil remediation, and promotion of plant growth.
Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotics in Mitigating Pesticide Toxicity in Teleost Fish: Mechanisms and Prospects.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Enhancing chlorpyrifos degradation and plant growth through biochar-assisted microbial remediation.Biodegradation · 2026Article
- Kinetic study of glyphosate biodegradation by actinobacterial consortium RH1: implications for bioremediation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The eleven combinations of four isolates, S. maltophilia, P. hibiscicola, P. aeruginosa, and P. monteilii, were prepared and screened for chlorpyrifos (CP) degradation. Among these combinations, four highly CP degrading consortia were identified: D: S. maltophilia, P. hibiscicola, P. monteilii, E: P. hibiscicola, P. aeruginosa, P. monteilii, F: S. maltophilia, P. hibiscicola, and G: S. maltophilia, P. aeruginosa. These combinations were found to be mutually compatible, exhibiting no lysis or inhibition zones. Their application significantly decreased in CP content from 37.6 to 68.6% as compared to control. Consortia-treated soil also displayed reduced bio-concentration factor and translocation of CP in W. somnifera. A significant increase in biomass (40-71.2%), protein content (38-66.6%), chlorophyll (24.7-52.3%), and secondary metabolite of W. somnifera was observed after the application of consortia. The activities of soil enzymes (alkaline phosphatase, dehydrogenase, and N-acetyl glucosaminidase), availability of nutrients, and soil microbial biomass carbon were also enhanced by the inoculation of consortia in soil. Overall, the results indicated that the consortium of S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa exhibited the highest potential for CP degradation and plant growth promotion compared to the others. This consortium could be effectively utilized for the rapid degradation of CP in agricultural soil vis-a-vis improvement in the productivity of the plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.