Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317378›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2025

Surgical and radiological outcomes of giant cell tumor of the bone: prognostic value of Campanacci grading and selective use of denosumab.

Jasminka Igrec, Lisa Jernej, Maria Anna Smolle, Jakob Steiner, Susanne Scheipl, Birgit Lohberger, Andreas Leithner, Iva Brcic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jasminka Igrec *Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8010, Graz, Austria. jasminka.igrec@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-8393
Lisa Jernej *Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Maria Anna SmolleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Jakob SteinerDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Susanne ScheiplDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Birgit LohbergerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas LeithnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Iva BrcicD&R Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010, Graz, Austria. iva.brcic@medunigraz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) have introduced molecular and radiological tools that refine clinical decision-making. H3.3 G34W immunohistochemical staining has become a routine diagnostic marker, while H3F3A mutational analysis enhances prognostic insights. Treatment primarily involves surgical methods such as curettage or en bloc resection, with denosumab serving as an adjunct in high-risk or inoperable cases.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 55 patients with GCTB, focusing on clinicopathologic and radiological findings. Tumors were evaluated using the Campanacci grading system. Immunohistochemical analysis with H3.3 G34W antibody and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed to detect H3F3A mutations. A subgroup of nine patients treated with denosumab was further analyzed for clinical outcomes and histological changes.

resultsThe cohort had a mean age of 37.7 years, with tumors most commonly affecting the knee joint (55%). All tested tumors demonstrated positive H3.3 G34W staining, with eight exhibiting H3F3A G34W mutations. Recurrence rates were 32% following curettage and 18% after en bloc resection. Denosumab treatment, administered for an average of 14.6 months, facilitated tumor downsizing and new bone formation without major side effects. Histologically, treated tumors showed a depletion of giant cells and increased bone matrix deposition.

conclusionsSurgery remains the cornerstone of GCTB treatment, with curettage or resection tailored to tumor characteristics. Denosumab offers a valuable adjunct in high-risk cases, enhancing surgical feasibility and promoting joint preservation. The Campanacci grading system continues to be a crucial tool for prognostication and treatment planning, particularly when complemented by molecular and radiological diagnostics. Future research should focus on integrating advanced imaging and artificial intelligence for personalized GCTB management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsDenosumabGiant Cell Tumor of BoneAdultCurettageFemaleHistonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabH3-3A protein, humanHistonesDenosumabGiant cell tumor of boneH3.3H3F3ARadiological imaging

Identifiers

PMID40317378
PMCPMC12049345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.