ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Non-oxime reactivators of organophosphate-inhibited cholinesterases.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organophosphorus compounds, including pesticides and nerve agents, irreversibly inhibit acetylcholinesterase, leading to an accumulation of acetylcholine that can cause a cholinergic crisis. Standard treatment of organophosphate poisoning relies on oxime-based reactivators, such as pralidoxime, obidoxime, or asoxime. However, these compounds have several limitations, including poor penetration through the blood-brain barrier and limited efficacy across a broad spectrum of organophosphorus compounds. For this reason, non-oxime reactivators were introduced as potential alternatives. The most promising non-oxime reactivators contain Mannich phenol moiety, imidazole group or combination of both. Some of the non-oxime derivatives demonstrated better efficacy than standard oximes during in vitro evaluation. Nevertheless, these structures have significant drawbacks such as high intrinsic acetylcholinesterase inhibition or high toxicity profile which make them unsuitable for further in vivo tests. In this review, the current progress in the development of non-oxime reactivators is summarized and their bioactivity as well as their limitations are critically discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.