Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317326›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Perceived impact of a decision-aid and planning tool for family building after cancer for young adult female cancer survivors.

Annemarie D Jagielo, Jacqueline Shanley, Michael A Diefenbach, Jennifer S Ford, Lidia Schapira, Catherine Benedict

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annemarie D JagieloPGSP-Stanford Psy.D. Consortium, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. ajagielo@stanford.edu.
Jacqueline ShanleyPGSP-Stanford Psy.D. Consortium, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Michael A DiefenbachDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Jennifer S FordHunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.
Lidia SchapiraStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.
Catherine BenedictDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Family-building After Cancer: Preferences, Decisions, and Planning for Young Female SurvivorsK07CA229186 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BENEDICT, CATHERINE · 2018 to 2023
$696k
NCI NIH HHS K07CA229186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeYoung adult female (YA-F) cancer survivors report fertility-related uncertainty and distress. Roadmap to Parenthood ("Roadmap") is a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer. This study examined the perceived impact of Roadmap, encompassing aspects of website utility and its effects on confidence and motivation, identified factors related to the perceived impact of Roadmap, and evaluated whether the perceived impact related to changes in psychosocial outcomes.

methodsSecondary analyses of a single-arm pilot study were conducted. Participants completed a baseline survey (T1), accessed Roadmap, and completed a survey 1 month post-baseline (T2). The eHealth Impact Questionnaire (eHIQ) measured the perceived impact of Roadmap. A linear regression model evaluated associations between baseline factors and the eHIQ. Linear regression models evaluated relationships between the eHIQ and decisional conflict, unmet information needs, fertility self-efficacy, and self-efficacy for managing fertility-related negative emotions at T2, controlling for baseline (T1) levels of each outcome.

resultsAmong participants (N = 98), 93% reported accessing Roadmap. A more positive perceived impact of Roadmap was related to younger age (β =  - .348 p = .002), lower household income (β =  - .321. p = .021), greater health literacy (β = .326 p = .004), and dissatisfaction with post-treatment fertility discussions (β =  - .279 p = .029). Those who reported a more positive perceived impact of Roadmap reported lower decisional conflict (β =  - .368, p < .001) and unmet information needs (β =  - .515, p < .001); self-efficacy outcomes were not related.

conclusionA web-based decision aid for family building after cancer effectively supports important survivor subgroups. Future directions include assessing the needs of those with low health literacy and improving patient-provider communication.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsDecision Support TechniquesNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsDecision MakingFemaleHumansInternetPilot ProjectsSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyYoung AdultDecision aidsDecision-makingeHealthOncofertilitySurvivorship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.