ArticleSurgery today2025
Impact of an improvement in the early left ventricular ejection fraction on the 1-year clinical outcomes and its predictors after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the 1-year clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, heart failure rehospitalization, and their composite) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and examined the baseline factors predicting ≥ 10% early LVEF improvement.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 44 patients who underwent TAVR and divided them into Group R (≥ 10% LVEF improvement, n = 25) or Group N (< 10% improvement, n = 19). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the survival rates, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify the predictors of LVEF improvement.
resultsThe mean patient age was 84.8 ± 4.8 years, and 40.9% were male. Post-TAVR, 56.8% of patients showed ≥ 10% LVEF improvement (mean increase: 16.7 ± 6.1%). The one-year mortality was similar between the groups (p = 0.383), whereas the composite endpoint tended to be higher in Group N (0.4% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.072). The peak aortic valve velocity was the only significant predictor (OR = 0.255, p = 0.048; cutoff: 4.45 m/s, sensitivity, 0.840; specificity, 0.684).
conclusionIn patients with severe AS and a preoperative LVEF of < 50%, 56.8% demonstrated a significant early LVEF improvement post-TAVR. Patients with a ≥ 10% improvement had a significantly lower 1-year mortality rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.