Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317120›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2026

Whose Responsibility Is It? A Community-Level Situational Analysis of Oral Health Care in Amsterdam.

S Begovic, M W van der Linden, K Rosing, L E de Almeida, M Lorenz, S Listl, M H van der Veen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S BegovicDepartment of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-1261-1103
M W van der LindenDepartment of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K RosingSection for Oral Health, Society and Technology, Department of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
L E de AlmeidaSection for Oral Health, Society and Technology, Department of Odontology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
M LorenzSection for Oral Health, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7738-8624
S ListlSection for Oral Health, Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8176-3397
M H van der VeenDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDELIVER (DELiberative ImproVEment of oRal care quality) is a multinational project funded under the EU's Horizon Europe program that aims to improve the quality of oral health care at the practice, community, national, and international levels. It is important to understand the current situation of oral health care quality to make improvements possible. This study aimed to map oral health care priorities among stakeholders in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and to describe how these stakeholders interacted to improve the quality of oral health care at the community level.

methodsA situational analysis approach was used to collate data from desk research and semi-structured interviews with key informants. Interview transcripts were analyzed and grouped into main themes and subthemes using inductive coding. A situational map, a social worlds/arenas map, and a positional map were constructed to represent the community-level situation of quality improvement of oral health care.

resultsInterviews were conducted with 10 professional stakeholders (5 social/welfare workers, 3 health care professionals, 1 public health professional, and 1 municipality policy maker). Stakeholders described prioritizing at least basic oral health care and stated that it should be accessible for everyone. Other priorities included a need for simplified access to oral health care and strengthened social support. While stakeholders agreed that people should not rely on emergency funds and volunteers, they felt that it was unclear which organizations or individuals were responsible for determining access to oral health care. This led social/welfare organizations to feel a sense of responsibility and offer informal care solutions.

conclusionThere was consensus among stakeholders about the need for social support and simplified access to oral health care for citizens. Stakeholders also emphasized the lack of clarity about who was responsible for oral health care and quality improvement at the community level, which highlighted the urgent need for improved governance, allocating responsibilities for oral health care quality improvement to all parties operating at the community level.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This study mapped the current practice of oral health care quality in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, through a situational analysis as a crucial starting point for enhancing quality improvement of oral health care at the community level. It underscored the need for clarity about responsibilities and provided insights for oral health care providers, social and welfare workers, policy makers, and researchers that could support research and policy formulation targeted at underserved populations, involving multiple stakeholders.

Indexed as

Oral HealthHumansNetherlandsQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareStakeholder Participationhealth accessibilityoral healthoral health policyqualitative researchquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40317120
PMCPMC12967396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.