Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40317065›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Assessment of personality disorders in adolescents - a clinical validity and utility study of the structured interview of personality organization (STIPO).

C Laczkovics, K Czernin, A Bründlmayer, M Zeiler, W Bangerl, C Prause, P L Plener, S Doering, V Blüml, J Carlitscheck and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C LaczkovicsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. clarissa.laczkovics@meduniwien.ac.at.
K CzerninDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
A BründlmayerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
M ZeilerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
W BangerlDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
C PrauseDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
P L PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
S DoeringDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
V BlümlDepartment of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J CarlitscheckMedical Faculty, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
S BenderMedical Faculty, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
M KrischerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Clinic Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of personality disorders (PD) in adolescence still poses a challenge. Early diagnosis and targeted intervention are called for, since patients with PD present with severe consequences in terms of psychosocial functioning and personal suffering including higher suicide risk. New guidelines advise semi-structured interviews for the dimensional assessment of personality functioning.

methodsWe included 136 patients aged 13 to 17.9 years with a categorical PD diagnosis and 35 healthy control (HC) adolescents to assess the applicability of the Structured Interview for Personality Organization (STIPO) for adolescents and evaluate its validity by correlating the six outcome domains (identity, object relations, defenses, aggression, moral values, reality testing) and the overall severity level to several validated instruments. Furthermore, we assessed personality traits, internalizing and externalizing behavior and depressive symptoms.

resultsAll STIPO domains differed significantly between patients and HC (p <  0.001). Outcome measures correlated significantly with validated self-rating questionnaires. STIPO severity levels correlated significantly with psychopathology. Personality traits "dissocial behavior" and "emotional dysregulation" correlated positively with all STIPO domains and the overall level of personality organization (PO).

conclusionsResults indicate that the STIPO is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of PD in adolescents. It comprises the core elements of personality functioning, as requested in Criterion A in the AMPD of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 and could be useful for treatment planning, evaluation of the course of treatment as well as for prognostic considerations.

Identifiers

PMID40317065
PMCPMC12049018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.