ArticleBMC chemistry2025
In vitro biological activity and nutritional evaluation of purple potato (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Vitelotte).
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ExploitingAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Ethnobotany to Food Innovation: Applications and Functional Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to produce functional flour from purple potatoes, which are relatively less known and have limited usage. Purple potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Vitelotte) and yellow potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) used in this study were cultivated in Türkiye. The purple potato flour (PPF) displayed higher values across various parameters, including total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids, total anthocyanins, antioxidant capacity, phenolic content, as well as in-vitro biological activities such as bioaccessibility, anti-diabetic activities, and anti-inflammatory properties, compared to the yellow potato flour (YPF). The mineral content ranking for both flour samples was K > P > Na > Mg > Ca > Fe > Zn > Mn > Cu > Se. The predominant phenolic compounds in PPF were chlorogenic acid, D-( +) malic acid, ferulic acid, and succinic acid. The compounds from anthocyanins found in purple vegetables and fruits, including malvidin chloride, cyanidin chloride, and cyanin chloride, were identified in PPF. PPF exhibited an average in-vitro bioaccessibility of 60%, whereas YPF demonstrated a slightly lower value of 48%. Regarding their in-vitro anti-diabetic activities, PPF showcased an α-amylase inhibition rate averaging 51.67% and an α-glucosidase inhibition rate at 36.22%. As a result of the study, it was observed that purple potato flour was a rich source of total phenolic content, dietary fiber, minerals, antioxidants, and anthocyanins. Considering its gluten-free nature, this functional flour is considered a potential alternative flour source for individuals with celiac disease, opening up new possibilities for various applications in our daily nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.